Now, speaking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that's normally used for even ten per cent of its potential.
What's it to possess the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", when the person has secured his wrist into the maximum following a dip and a couple of strokes, then return immediately to couch under the umbrella?
If this is their principal use it's merely the fault of old habits at least as much as the debut of the so-called divers of the modern age that dates back to the middle of the previous century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three decades later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces the category can boast, was tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to challenge the depths of the well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film additionally winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist became a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other without the crown shield shoulders, imitated a little by everyone.
These are only two of the first cases that reveal how - fiction or reality - for more than fifty years the press - driven by the watch sector - decided the diver watches ought to be the first to personify the idea of man-adventure. Maybe it is also from this day the brands when it came to describing their versions began to use the phrase: "appropriate for any occasion".
The 007 change, sadly also the legendary "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanisms of the most well-known spy in the world, and obviously also the watch whose function has been played by the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their actual use within this massive family whose origins would only deal with "hard more than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to fear even when you need to wash the hands.
However, a real diver's watch has generally always had a whole lot to say technically talking. Let's just mention the features and constructive characteristics of these fascinating references.
I've a long-standing friend who is an expert diver and that, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100 percent of his diving watch - like that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at large depths.
A real wrist sub must be able to ensure these performances:
Excellent visibility during the dip
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate confirmation of the performance of the device that reports the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficacy of its movement, either mechanical or quartz
However, the tests didn't end here: today professional diving watches must adhere to certain rules like those described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal usage, that which we all know is the greatest, the best sub could be ultimately a watchable to offer features considerably milder and easier to handle.
I remember that in order to simply immerse the surface at maximum safety, a timepiece should be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which appears to be redundant, but that is not so when it's done a trivial swim in the sea. It would be better to prevent diving, particularly if ours couldn't even count on a screw-on crown better still when protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
And the security on the waterproof status of this submerged timepieces?
Precisely for those who'd use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to have the ability to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown isn't completely screwed, and the watch is therefore at a clear condition of non-security.
Unfortunately, this is the principal reason why an abyssal super dip watch might have to be hurried into a service centre, prior to seawater entering it risks compromising any mechanism indefinitely. This function currently exists, however on very few models, which frankly I don't understand why.
You might have worn out your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, have left to twist the crown check here snugly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume decide on the fly : either leave your diver someplace safe or obligatorily create a final but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen a little 'of issues linked to the time that has to meet the water, and given the essential information, I reveal you which - at least to date - are for me the best dive watches.
They are not many: I've split them into two classes. The order in which they appear does not represent any ranking.